Consider the call for more time for the weapons inspectors. Remember when the inspectors were there to verify that Saddam's regime was disarmed? It was going to take a few weeks - just like it took South Africa, Ukraine and Kazakhstan a few weeks to disarm their weapons of mass destruction. Twelve years later, the verification teams have become detectives. They've gone from checking boxes on forms, to checking soil samples and spy-plane photos.
Originally, they were there to provide Saddam an opportunity to show the world he had disarmed. Now, the idea has crept in that the onus is on them to catch Saddam red-handed, with a "smoking gun", guilty beyond reasonable doubt. This is a dangerous unacknowledged shift, because Hans Blix cannot perform a totally exhaustive search. He can only report "we have not found anything - yet" or "they have not disarmed". The "nothing yet" message might mean that Saddam has disarmed, or merely that he's skilled at hiding his weapons programs. Who but the Iraqis can say?
If Saddam truly has disarmed, how does waiting longer help? What could happen in April that couldn't happen in February? The current weapons inspection program is incapable of giving the world the "all clear" signal that Iraq's persecuted minorities and neighbours deserve.